A Poison Cake [Review by Israel Shamir of Melanie Phillips The World Turned Upside Down will appear in the Culture Wars - this is preview ] British columnist Melanie Phillips has discovered Captain Hooks recipe and used it to prepare her recent book: it is a tempting green, but its dangerous to eat. Many pages can be swallowed with no ill effect, but once the reader has succumbed to Phillips message of spiritual comfort, the sheer poison of her conclusions sets in. The worst part is that this venom is targeted at our best and brightest. Phillips
opposes the things we oppose, and she presents our
viewpoints very nicely. She rejects New Age, pagan cults,
and Madonnas Cabbala; she dislikes mass
immigration and regrets the decline of the Church; she
defends Catholics who oppose pro-homosexual schooling and
adoption policies. She is against vilifying men in the
name of protecting women as in the case of Julian Assange.
She has baked us a cake that we can really enjoy; its
just that the icing has been contaminated with the
strychnine of Jewish Supremacy. Remember that this same
Melanie Phillips was such an inspiration for the mad
Norwegian murderer Breivik, who enthused about her and
quoted her at length. It is not the fault of a writer, to
be sure, when a fan goes off the deep end. But the poison
of Breiviks obsessive Judeophilia, the very thing
that attracted him to Phillips, has been layered into her
book. If you must read it, take it carefully, in small
bites, as a fish nibbles away the tasty worm from the
deadly steel hook. Phillips
starts with a reasonable assumption: people should be
allowed to have their own opinions and speak their minds
even if their traditional outlooks do not conform to post-modern
ideas. As long as Phillips calls for greater tolerance
for traditions that run afoul of the new hegemony, we
will applaud her. Like any great liberal, she empathises
with the sorrowful fates of these new dissidents: people
who do not believe in Global Warming or Darwinism, who
resist the charms of homosexuality, and the silent
majority who still trust in God. She does not say they
are right, just that they should not be persecuted. Phillips
deals well with arguments concerning Darwin, the man, and
his bastard stepchildren, the modern Darwinists.
She points out that Darwinism has become a new religion
divorced from reason, whose adepts are as fanatic as they
come. The belief that Creation was false did not
derive from Darwinism. Darwinism derived from the belief
that Creation is false. Darwinism is not
proven, she reminds us; it is a theory that new evidence
seems to disprove. She is no creationist; her heart lies
with Intelligent Design (ID), a theory that
appeals to many believers and doubters alike. The
proponents of ID understand how unlikely it is that
advanced forms of life developed on this world by pure
happenstance. They employ Sherlock Holmes famous
dictum and accept the improbable truth of an intelligent
designer, whether it be our traditional concept of God or
something more fashionable - like an extra-terrestrial.
ID reaches across the walls that have divided modernists
from the beliefs of their ancestors. Phillips points out
that scientists have been sacked and their books refused
publication because they had the temerity to support ID,
or, increasingly, because they rejected Global Warming. Phillips
explains that Global Warming is not a certain fact but a
passing fad of a theory, already disproved by many
experiments, but notes that even if it were
universally accepted it still would not justify the
ferocious onslaught against skeptics. However, while
Phillips approves of dissidents and deniers of Evolution
and Climate Change, her largesse stops well short of
offering the same treatment to Holocaust dissidents and
deniers. She is as merciless to Holocaust doubters as
Dawkins is to Evolution doubters. Phillips will not
defend the scientists who deny that HIV causes AIDS. The
people who doubt the official version of 9-11 will find
no comfort in this book. Phillips ducks the charge of
hypocrisy by labelling these theories conspiratorial;
she refuses conspiracy nuts the indulgent
attitude she demands for the causes she prefers. And yet
Melanie Phillips is quite a denier in her own right. She
denies that Bush and Blair once justified the Iraq war by
invoking Saddam Husseins WMD (though we all
remember it); she denies that Israel murdered Muhammad al
Durra (though we all saw it); finally, she even denies
the very existence of the Israel Lobby in the US (though
we all feel its presence). For her, Walt and Mearsheimers
sober book The
Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy is nothing
more than a modern version of the Protocols of
the Elders of Zion. In
the false dichotomy between science and faith, Phillips
maintains that faith is conducive to science. The
universe is orderly, she quotes, for it was
created by God, and therefore it can be explored and its
laws summarised. Excellent, we say! She has found a
bedrock Logos, a definitive principle that we can apply
in every circumstance. Not quite: Jewish particularism is
still the tiresome exception to the rule. It is
not religion in general but the Hebrew [sic!] Bible
in particular that gave rise to Western science.
She raises science up to God, and then hands it over to
the Hebrews, essentially privatising the Holy Book. Why
does she single out the Hebrew Tanakh? Why not the
Greek Septuagint, or the Latin Vulgata? Why
not the entire King James Version? Because,
explains Phillips, there is a perfect marriage of
religion and reason in Judaism. She is apparently
completely unaware that the Jews had no idea of science
before it came to them through their host nations.
Likewise, Jewish ideological and theological advances
were as a rule borrowed from their Christian and Muslim
neighbours, whether we speak of the rationalist
Maimonides or the mystical Cabbalists. In the 15th
century, Jewish scientist Abraham Zacuto described how
the Jews had picked up their scientific knowledge from
the Gentiles. Phillips is too quick to trade history for
ideology. Phillips
then confronts the current situation in England. She does
not like what she sees: the subversion of the Church of
England, the mass immigrations, the drop in educational
standards, the unravelling of culture, the waves of
divorces and abortions. Who is going to disagree with
that? England is certainly in dire straits. Neoliberal
policies have undermined the toughest folk on earth: the
hard-working, prudent, obedient, stiff-lipped and red-faced
Brits; the people who once managed India, once burned
down the White House and once stood up to Hitlers
fury. The British backbone, the Yorkshire miners and
Sheffield steel workers, has been broken by their Golders
Green grocer-at-large, a.k.a. the Iron Lady.
Thatcher shuttered UK industries and turned the Isles
into a Tortuga-like pirates paradise, a place for
financiers to relax, unwind and plan their raids. England
has become home base to al Fayed and Abramovich and to
the millions of immigrants imported to service them. England
has become the most godless society in the world. Buses
emblazoned with Theres probably no God
cruise London. In the Globe theatre, medieval British
plays are still staged (The Mysteries, purported
to be a revival of Tony Harrisons 1977 production)
but eerily different: todays versions are overtly
anti-Christian. The Holy Virgin is now represented as a
young coloured tart in a short dress. Instead of the
Jewish high priest and his coterie, the antagonists are
now Christian priests in full dress. Not a single voice
of protest has sounded in England. But you can be sure
that if director Deborah Bruce had left the rabbis in
their traditional places, we'd never have heard the end
of it. For
me, its a sign of the total victory of the Jewish
spirit, a spirit that was extolled by Milton Friedman and
rejected by Karl Marx: the spirit of financial capitalism.
The Jews have won all their battles: they promoted
immigration, supported Thatcher, stood next to Friedman,
denied Christ and dismantled the welfare state. The
results for the vast majority were awful, as they are
every time Jews win. But Melanie Phillips prefers to not
assign blame. For her, these common observations are
nothing more than ad hominem attacks against Jewry:
The precepts of Judaism, the Hebrew Bible and
the Jewish people are the underlying target in the uproar
over social, cultural and moral issues, manmade global
warming, Darwinism, the Iraq War, and of course Israel.
Her chutzpah does not stop there; she claims that
the bedrock values of Western civilisation rest
upon and are deeply intertwined with the teachings and
fate of the Jewish people. Any
little bird will see a tsunami as a personal disaster
while dismissing destroyed cities as collateral damage.
This is how Phillips sees the world: Although in
the war between materialism and religion the frontline
casualty has been Christianity, the real target has been
the faith of the Hebrew Bible. This incredibly
myopic statement lays bare her essential philosophy.
Phillips is morbidly Judeocentric and narcissistic, both
prominent Jewish qualities. If tomorrows headline
in the Times screams NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST: TWO BILLION
PEOPLE KILLED, she would fire off a quick letter to
the editor objecting to the use of the H-word, for
how can you compare! For
her, the Jews are always right. If they have a fault, it
is that they are too kind, too good and too eager to
please. While Phillips makes it clear that Jews are
suffering along with the rest of us, she does not seem to
understand that many of these Jews actively (and publicly)
worked to bring the UK and the US to ruin. Why did they
do it? They did it because they did not understand that
they would also suffer as society unravels. They thought,
as in the Jewish joke, everywhere will be Saturday but
the rabbis will remain in a perennial Friday. A tiny
minority of Jews came out on top; the rest pay the
price for their vocal support of their brethren. Phillips
dedicates a few chapters to the Middle East. She adores
the Jewish state, hates Palestinians and Muslims in
general. She quotes the same sources Breivik did in his
Manifesto and comes to his same conclusions. If you have
read Frontline Magazine, you are familiar with
this kind of screed. When Phillips opposes modern
materialism you might take her for a nice churchy lady
from the Home Counties, but when she touches on Islam and
Jews she turns into a screaming fury. Her
hatred of Palestinians (why cant they just go
away?) helps us understand her vision of Christianity.
Philips is not against Christianity per se (or she
would write for a different audience); she imagines for
us a thoroughly Judaised, subdued Christianity-for-Goyim,
a lower-tier entry-level faith for non-Jews. Adherents of
Melanie Phillips Christianity-Lite will
daily ask the Lord that He permit them to better serve
the Jews. She denies Replacement Theology (Supersessionism),
even though this is at the root of Christian dogma. She
is shocked that Christians consider themselves to be the
True Israel. What about the Jews, she shrills.
Educated Christians understand that modern-day Jews have
no valid claim on the title Israel (the Chosen
People of God); they are false pretenders. The title
belongs now and forever to the Christian Church [for more,
see Cabbala
of Power]. The
most striking thing in Melanie Phillips book is her
obsession with the extended Jewish Nation: for her, the
absolute centrality of the Jews in this world is a given.
She exactly mirrors the atheist (though still Jew-obsessed)
thinkers of the late 19th and early 20th
centuries that wanted to reform the Jews. Neither seem to
understand that for Christians, there is no Jewish
Question that needs to be solved, nor should we put
them on a pedestal. For us, Jews are not central. They
are a powerful faction that generally supports societys
anti-Christian tendencies, without being its centre.
Phillips proves beyond a doubt that when Jews start
cooking with Christianity, the result is pure poison. Edited
by Paul Bennett
|